@Paul, Thank you for that summary. This is a great example of what we could call “user generated IFR enhancements”, and I think that we should be enthusiastically supportive of all such endeavors. Our original mission with IFR was never to try to monopolize the music teaching industry. The goal from the beginning was just to share the joy of creating music with all of the beautiful, sensitive music lovers out there who would LOVE to discover and express their own music.
We certainly want to stay in business because we’ve invested more than 10 years now in creating learning materials to help musicians find this creative path. But “staying in business” doesn’t mean chasing down every struggling musician in the world and demanding to see his receipt for any IFR materials that may have come into his possession. So we’re not interested in getting in your way, inserting ourselves into the process just to make sure that every user of your practice tool has paid for the underlying IFR materials. We would much rather this be a free and open community, because the higher mission has always been to spread the enjoyment of music to everyone.
From a copyright perspective, the only issue is that intellectual property law REQUIRES us to vigorously and unambiguously assert our copyright claim every time the subject comes up. In other words, I can’t openly authorize people to use our materials without paying for them, because this can be interpreted later in court as invalidating our copyright in general. This can lead to situations that really would destroy the entire IFR project, like for example other people counterfeiting our entire website and learning program and selling those materials online in direct competition with us, perhaps at a fraction of the price since to them it would be all stolen profit anyway.
But here’s how I think we can resolve all of these different issues and goals:
-
Before publishing any tool that uses copyrighted IFR content, please do request explicit permission from me. This protects both of us. It protects you against any accusation of copyright infringement because you will have our written permission for the exact thing you want to publish. And for us, it gives us a kind of control valve that allows us to object to uses of our materials that we wouldn’t approve. For example, you might imagine a similar enhancement to one of our video courses. But I would absolutely NOT approve giving away those entire video courses along with your enhancement, and I wouldn’t even be comfortable relying on the honor system for something like that. For any product that significant, the appropriate course of action would be to work with you to incorporate your enhancement into the official IFR product. But because all of these are judgement calls, we just need to review each proposed use of IFR copyrighted content on a case by case basis. That way we can avoid misunderstandings and you can be sure that anything you are sharing is totally fine.
-
Please limit your publication of your practice tools to this IFR Student Forum. This serves multiple purposes. First, it enhances the value of our student forum which is beneficial to the entire IFR community. Second, it protects you from misunderstandings and potential missteps because you have the entire IFR community here to see what you’re doing and express any concerns they have. Third, it allows myself and the other IFR team members to stay current with how these student generated enhancements are evolving. So whenever you create practice tools that make use of copyrighted IFR content, I would ask you to please limit your publication of these materials to this student forum. (But it’s fine if you want to communicate the existence of these tools beyond our forum. For example, you might publish something on Facebook or in an email newsletter letting your own followers know about the new tool you created. But those announcements should link directly here to the IFR Student Forum for full details and access to the tool. If the tool itself needs to be served from a 3rd party service like Dropbox, then the Dropbox link should only be available here in the IFR Student Forum. You get the idea. We just want everyone seeking your tool to come to the IFR Student Forum as the gateway to the content.)
-
In all of your publications about your tool, you just need to be very clear about the copyrighted IFR materials that appear in your practice tool. But you can communicate this in a very friendly and positive way. Here is an example:
IMPORTANT: This tool makes use of copyrighted content from the IFR ear training course “Sing the Numbers 1: The IFR Tonal Map”. If you haven’t yet purchased this course from IFR, please purchase it here before using my tool:
In terms of copyright, the above three steps are all we need. And for this specific idea of sharing your self-test enhancement to our Sing the Numbers course, you have my blessing in sharing it as long as you respect the three requirements above.
At the risk of over-sharing, I also want to tag @mem, @hender99 and @DavidW just because this is an important issue and you have all made such wonderful contributions to our community. But I won’t keep tagging everyone on every post. So if there is further discussion on this thread and if you want to follow the conversation, please just remember to keep coming back and checking the thread for updates.
Thank you all. Just thinking of you and exploring these topics together is such a privilege for me. You’re all wonderful.